Wah Wah Check ....

Open discussion about all things BJFE

Moderator: Moderators

Postby DCHORD » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:26 pm

I use the Teese RMC3, very versatile with it's tweakabillity, can adapt to most situations. But like someone above wrote, pain in the a$$ to adjust.
Amps:Tophats T-45, Ambassador 50, SD 2x12 Guitars: 93 LP Classic Premium + CS "60"s Strat,BJF: RRB, EGDM, Model R, PPF, DRD, SBEQ, MP LGW,Choralflange,TC Nova Delay, TC Nova Reverb
DCHORD
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:58 am
Location: South Bend Indiana

Postby DocRock » Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:50 am

TheWarmth wrote:I have been told that the Area 51 wah with all of the controls options is pretty amazing, too.


Did you get to try mine at Ronnie's thing back in November? Been using mine for almost two years now.

Been through Dunlop GCB-95, 535Q (18v), Vox Reissue, both Fulltones, Teese RMC2 & RMC3, Keeley Mello Wah (Vox Mod), Budda, etc.

Area 51 rules.
Get in where you fit in.
DocRock
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: The Caves of Altamira
Guitars:: 2010 Linhof Custom
Fender '69 Thinline Telecaster with Harmonic Design pickups (MIM)
1990 Fender Squier II Stratocaster with G&L MFD pickups
amps: Aiken Sabre
1955 "Montgomery Ward"-branded Valco 1x8 combo
pedals: 9

Postby DocRock » Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:50 am

DCHORD wrote:I use the Teese RMC3, very versatile with it's tweakabillity, can adapt to most situations. But like someone above wrote, pain in the a$$ to adjust.


+1000 ... precisely why I ditched mine.
Get in where you fit in.
DocRock
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: The Caves of Altamira
Guitars:: 2010 Linhof Custom
Fender '69 Thinline Telecaster with Harmonic Design pickups (MIM)
1990 Fender Squier II Stratocaster with G&L MFD pickups
amps: Aiken Sabre
1955 "Montgomery Ward"-branded Valco 1x8 combo
pedals: 9

Postby huckleboogie » Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:36 am

TheWarmth wrote:I've got a Teese Wizard Wah that I like quite a bit. It works well with distortion and fuzz (I place it after my od/fuzz pedals). The only wah that I've tried that I've liked better has been a Landgraff, but the wait time is a year or more and the price is hefty. I have been told that the Area 51 wah with all of the controls options is pretty amazing, too.


i heard great things bout the Wizard wah (its red one, right?) i'm just wondering how it sounds for more clean stuff....i really been thinkin to replace my picture wah with the wizard but i'm not sure if it's able to cover that ground as well. and it would look really stupid to have 2 wahs on the board:-)
do you use the Wizard wah for "cleaner" sounds and how does it work for You?
cheers, Lars
User avatar
huckleboogie
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 8:05 am
Guitars:: Vinetto DC 60 SB Artifact, suhr classic strat
amps: Goodsell 33, fender prosonic, Fender 1966 Deluxe amp
pedals: 23

Postby horsehead75 » Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:32 am

Hi!

I?m totally satisfied with my Budda wah. Works very well (for my taste) with HB pair.. and Folk Fuzz.
"if you ain?t got the blues, you ain?t got a thing"
horsehead75
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:51 am
Location: Finland
Guitars:: Fender Telecasters: blonde mapleneck 1972, 1973, 1982 '52 RI
amps: Mad Professor CS-40 (#71) w/ matching 2x12" (Red Fangs) cab
Mad Professor OS21 (proto #8) head - w/ matching 2x10" (Red Fangs) cab
Mad Professor OS11 (proto #4) w/ 10" Red Fang.
pedals: 11

Postby TheWarmth » Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:02 am

Yeah, I think the Wizard works just fine for cleaner tones. I don't know if I'd say it's an ultra-versatile wah, as it doesn't have any adjustable tone controls, aside from a volume trimmer on the inside, but it works great for me. You might want to look into the Area 51, too, though.

Doc ... I didn't get to try yours at Ronnie's. I didn't even think of it. Bummer. I can't afford to buy a new wah right now anyway, though.
User avatar
TheWarmth
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Chicago

Postby Eskimo_Joe » Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:05 pm

Just a random thing to pass along...in a flash of over indulgence I bought two Supa Quacks at the same time...just fyi--there was quite a bit of difference in them. Both were LE versions (some vintage parts) so maybe that played into it. One was phenominal and one was just OK. Just thought I'd pass that along.
User avatar
Eskimo_Joe
 
Posts: 698
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:27 am
Location: Saint Louis
pedals: 0

Postby cabo » Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:00 am

Eskimo_Joe wrote:Just a random thing to pass along...in a flash of over indulgence I bought two Supa Quacks at the same time...just fyi--there was quite a bit of difference in them. Both were LE versions (some vintage parts) so maybe that played into it. One was phenominal and one was just OK. Just thought I'd pass that along.


Hi EJ,
Curious as to what BJF dist/OD you use most with the Supa?
I have a LE as well, I find the more compressed the fuzz or distortion the less compatable it is.
It seems to react better when a heavy distortion pedal has a more open feel.
Like you say maybe all the LEs are slightly different.
cabo
User avatar
cabo
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Maryland
Guitars:: Bevy of Swans
amps: CS40, MP101, LAMs
pedals: 0

Postby zion » Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:41 am

I'm running a Supa Quack that was E. Johnsons and by some twist of fate I ended up with it. The BJFE pedal that seemed to melt with it is the PPF. Man, they were made for each other. I'm also using an Tycobrahe Parapedal from back in the day and it seems to like the harder dirt pedals. Tore it up with the CAF.
zion
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:20 pm
Location: Sevierville, TN
Guitars:: All Lefty's...
Fender American Standard Strat
Kirn Barnbuster Tele
Gibson Blues King Electro
Deering Banjo
Eastman Mandolin
amps: Fractal AxeFx - Liquid Foot Jr.-Atomic Reactors
pedals: 3

Postby Eskimo_Joe » Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:45 am

cabo wrote:
Eskimo_Joe wrote:Just a random thing to pass along...in a flash of over indulgence I bought two Supa Quacks at the same time...just fyi--there was quite a bit of difference in them. Both were LE versions (some vintage parts) so maybe that played into it. One was phenominal and one was just OK. Just thought I'd pass that along.


Hi EJ,
Curious as to what BJF dist/OD you use most with the Supa?
I have a LE as well, I find the more compressed the fuzz or distortion the less compatable it is.
It seems to react better when a heavy distortion pedal has a more open feel.
Like you say maybe all the LEs are slightly different.
cabo



Hey cabo!

Overall, I think my Supa Quack works best with medium over drives like the Baby Blue, the Sparkling Yellow, and my Landgraff DO. That said, it also works great with virtually all of my distortions. The only issue is with some really heavy fuzzes (mostly D*A*M pedals). Anyway, I think you're right when you say the more compressed it is, the less pleasing the tone. I'd love to drop a foxrox buffer into it, but I'm scared it would mess with the tone somehow. I've heard Analogman sells a foxrox buffer in a stand alone box. It'd be nice to try that. What about for you?
User avatar
Eskimo_Joe
 
Posts: 698
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:27 am
Location: Saint Louis
pedals: 0

PreviousNext

Return to BJFE Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest