by EyeFly » Tue May 19, 2009 5:19 pm
Interesting concept and I certainly like and agree with the good DocRocks response; not likely to find anything more worthy than those seven.
In addition, I've always had the philosophy that the strong must care for the weak. That seems somewhat trite I guess but it is really a pretty great concept when you put it into action as we all change roles from the strong to the weak pretty much on a daily basis.
For example, let's say you are a physician and want to buy a home. You will find that the person who knows the realty market is strong in that regard and you are weak, easily taken advantage of at the very least. So, in that situation, you would certainly want honesty, sincerity, and a modicum of knowledge rendered on the part of your realtor to protect you from the foibles mostly of which you are unaware. Now, that same realtor may come to you the following week with a sore throat and fever. Here, the realtor is weak and is expecting the same level of conscientiousness and care from you in your role as the strong.
The same applies when parents care for the very young and they grow to take care of their parents when they are very old.
It's a pretty universal and practical concept. I always try to ascertain when I am in a position of strength or weakness and when in strength, I go the extra mile to ensure care for the weak. When weak, I work to improve my vantage but rely too on the hope that the strong will care for me. I have done my best to ensure my children know and use this strategy as well.
I guess it boils down to this. We all have a piece of the pie; what we do with it, how we cut, shape, share, or hoard it, well, that is our legacy.
May not have been what you were looking for but thought I'd give it a go. Haven't been able to respond much for a while on the Forum; been in a position of weakness! Good to see you up and posting again Mike.
cork